As the lingering internal crisis rocking the ruling All Progressives
Congress (APC) threatens to splinter the party, the top hierarchy of the
party has decided to sacrifice its national chairman, Chief
John
Odigie-Oyegun.
This tactical move to ease out the APC’s National Chairman is seen
as an interim measure to stabilize the ruling party and save it from
imploding.
The AUTHORITY learned from impeccable sources that the outgoing Edo
State governor, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, whose second-term as
governor ends on the 12th November 2016, has been penciled down to
replace embattled Oyegun as the party’s national chairman.
To firm up this ‘coup’ against Oyegun, which has the presidency’s
backing, The AUTHORITY also scooped that President Muhammadu Buhari
has agreed to a “face saving” ambassadorial position for the
out-of-favour Oyegun.
Party Sources confirmed that “there is no going back on the
decision”. Rightly or wrongly, Oyegun who guided the APC to victory
over the PDP has been accused of “killing” the party.
The choice of Comrade Oshiomhole stems from the fact that, like
Oyegun, he is from the South-South geo-political zone – with the
clincher that he has a solid labour background.
By a convenient coincidence for the APC, Oshiomhole’s tenure as governor will be ending in a matter of weeks.
Several party sources with knowledge about this development that The
AUTHORITY sounded out hope that Oshiomhole will be able to build the
APC into a formidable “populist” party, a “ party in every sense of the
word.”
As a specific diversionary tactic and to create the condition
necessary for the scripted scenario to play out, Oyegun is expected to
‘resign’ – a quirky, cloned template of PDP succession intrigues then.
It will be recalled that following the recent APC governorship
primary election in Ondo State that produced a candidate who is not
Asiwaju Ahmed Tinubu’s choice, Tinubu openly called for Oyegun’s
resignation, a position Oyegun dismissed out of hand.
According to a miffed Oyegun, “Yes, I agree that the nature of the
statement was a bit harsh. The methods of getting rid of a national
chairman, if that is what I will call it, are spelled out in the
constitution; they don’t take place on the pages of newspapers.”
Although Tinubu and Oyegun shook hands and exchanged pleasantries
during Buhari’s recent book launch in Abuja, their relationship
appeared to have been irreparably damaged.
Apparently tipping the scale against Oyegun, former Vice-President
Atiku Abubakar recently expressed a public position which apparently
backed Tinubu.
The Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the APC, Timi Frank, also
recently accused Oyegun of mismanaging the party, alleging that a lot
of things have gone wrong in the APC because of Oyegun’s leadership
style.
Frank, who described Oyegun as a political liability, said what APC
needs is a leader who will add political value to the party. He also
slammed Oyegun, saying he does not understand the constitution of the
APC.
According to Frank, “This is the reason why I will continue to fight
to ensure that the APC takes Nigeria to the right place but as long as
Odigie-Oyegun remains as national chairman, we cannot achieve anything.
Now that I am calling for his resignation, some may think it is
personal, but it is not.
“We need a national chairman that will add political value to our
party, we need a national chairman that can lead the party to victory
during elections and we do not need a national chairman who will
clearly be a political liability to this party as we head towards
elections.
“We need a national chairman that will understand and follow due
process in carrying out functions within the party. We need a chairman
who understands the constitution in words and in deed.”
But cogent posers are already emerging that could affect the
smoothness of this dodgy succession plot. The key question here is –
would Oyegun who has the reputation of a plucky fighter agree to
resign?
Already, the ruling party has unforeseen challenges replacing its
national publicity secretary Lai Mohammed. The AUTHORITY gathered that
the plan to replace him with former sports minister under President
Goodluck Jonathan, Alhaji Bolaji Abdullahai, was aborted by forces
opposed to the emerging stranglehold of Senate President Bukola Saraki
on the party. Bolaji Abdulahi is a protégé of Saraki.
From what is apparently playing out, the APC is threading the now
opposition PDP’s path. It will be recalled that Chief Solomon Lar, who
guided the party to victory, was similarly replaced by Chief Barnabas
Gemade.
Many have not forgotten that the PDP has not recovered from that ugly beginning.
The AUTHORITY also gathered that Oyegun is ready for a vicious battle
against Ambassador Babagana Kingibe, who is presently working as an
“Executive Assistant” to the controversial and powerful Chief of Staff
to President Buhari, Alhaji Abba Kyari .
Kingibe was running mate to Chief MKO Abiola, the acclaimed winner of the annulled June 12 presidential election.
He is widely perceived to have been one of the key insider forces
that aided the trade-off of Abiola’s acclaimed and historic
Muslim-Muslim ticket victory.
Kingibe is campaigning for the position of Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the United Nations.
For Odigie-Oyegun to leave office, the APC NWC must bow to the
demands of several party stakeholders and groups to organise an
emergency National Executive Council (NEC) meeting or a mini
convention, where all the permutations on the enthronement of
Oshiomhole and Abdulahi as well as other vacant NWC positions may be
ratified.
For example, some non-NWC members of the NEC had last week issued a
two-week ultimatum to the Odigie-Oyegun led NWC to convene an
emergency NEC meeting to discuss the many issues rocking the unity of
the APC.
The group in a communique issued at the end of its meeting in Abuja
and signed by Hon. Omolaoye O. Akintola, National Ex-Officio, South
West and Coordinator, noted, with regret, the inability of the NWC
under Odigie-Oyegun to convene the quarterly NEC meeting as contained
in the party’s constitution.
The APC constitution states clearly that only the NEC or party convention can ratify the choice of any national officer.
Kindly like our facebook fanpage and also follow us on twitter below.